{"id":785,"date":"2010-01-03T11:13:45","date_gmt":"2010-01-03T09:13:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/?p=785"},"modified":"2010-01-04T16:40:27","modified_gmt":"2010-01-04T14:40:27","slug":"godwin-revisited","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/2010\/01\/godwin-revisited\/","title":{"rendered":"Godwin revisited"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Avantajul internetelor este c\u0103-s neterminate, infinite \u015fi bine\u00een\u0163eles gratuite. Dac\u0103 \u00een via\u0163a real\u0103 m\u0103 apuc s\u0103 vorbesc cu o persoan\u0103, discu\u0163ia fie merge \u00een consens \u015fi am\u00e2ndoi explor\u0103m pu\u0163in apoi fum\u0103m un joint; fie discu\u0163ia merge \u00een contradictoriu \u015fi petrecem un oarecare timp aduc\u00e2nd argumente pro \u015fi contra. La un moment dat obosim \u015fi fie schimb\u0103m subiectul fie ne desp\u0103r\u0163im. Majoritatea disputelor din via\u0163a real\u0103 nu rezist\u0103 mai mult de o zi.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pe internet \u00eens\u0103, odat\u0103 ce ai scris o chestie, ea r\u0103m\u00e2ne. Ast\u0103zi scriu un post pe forum despre un subiect sensibil. R\u0103spunsurile \u015fi dezbaterea pot continua teoretic la nesf\u00e2r\u015fit, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 1) argumentele r\u0103m\u00e2n scrise, nu trebuie s\u0103 te \u00eentrebi de fiecare dat\u0103 &#8220;uh, unde r\u0103m\u0103sesem?&#8221; \u015fi 2) probabil dup\u0103 6 pagini de argumente comentatorii noi vor ignora chestiile scrise mai demult. See, perpetuum mobile.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bun, av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere proprietatea asta a internetului, se va g\u0103si oric\u00e2nd un num\u0103r de comentatori care s\u0103 duc\u0103 discu\u0163ia \u00een derizoriu pentru c\u0103 a\u015fa vor ei. \u00cen principiu prin trolling \u015fi flaming. Cea mai cunoscut\u0103 tehnic\u0103 de flaming este exact rezultatul Legii lui Godwin. S\u0103 enun\u0163\u0103m legea:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"text-align: justify;\"><p>Pe m\u0103sur\u0103 ce o discu\u0163ie pe internet devine mai lung\u0103, \u015fansa ca subiectul discu\u0163iei s\u0103 fie deviat \u00eenspre nazism sau Hitler se apropie de 100%.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">E simplu: mergi din compara\u0163ie \u00een compara\u0163ie p\u00e2n\u0103 ajungi la nazism. Spre exemplu se discut\u0103 ergonomia \u015fi utilitatea tastaturilor Microsoft. Un comentator inocent spune despre ele c\u0103 sunt foarte confortabile \u015fi u\u015for de utilizat, dar c\u0103 e p\u0103cat de butoanele func\u0163ionale care-s recunoscute doar \u00een Windows. Se va g\u0103si (cu probabilitate mare) un al doilea comentator care s\u0103 sar\u0103 pe subiect \u015fi s\u0103 confirme c\u0103 Microsoft creeaz\u0103 tastaturi folosibile doar cu Windows. Al treilea comentator va duce discu\u0163ia mai departe \u00een derizoriu, exclam\u00e2nd dezgustat c\u0103 Microsoft au gustul domin\u0103rii prea pronun\u0163at. Celui de-al patrulea comentator nu-i r\u0103m\u00e2ne dec\u00e2t s\u0103 pun\u0103 \u00een aplicare legea lui Godwin, spun\u00e2nd ceva de genul &#8220;Microsoft vor s\u0103 domine lumea, exact ca nazi\u015ftii&#8221;. Subiectul poate fi \u00eenchis, discu\u0163ia despre ergonomia tastaturilor a fost demult uitat\u0103. Pentru alte detalii, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.faqs.org\/faqs\/usenet\/legends\/godwin\/\" target=\"_blank\">aici<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u00cen Rom\u00e2nia \u00eens\u0103, nazismul nu pare a fi o ideologie prea interesant\u0103. Compara\u0163iile din mentalul colectiv rom\u00e2nesc se fac prin raportare la ceea ce \u015ftim noi cel mai bine, prin urmare la comunism. Orice discu\u0163ie pe internet poate fi dus\u0103 \u00een derizoriu utiliz\u00e2nd compara\u0163ia &#8220;e\u015fti ca un comunist&#8221;, indiferent c\u0103 se discut\u0103 defapt despre pre\u0163ul laptelui, avort sau eutanasierea c\u00e2inilor turba\u0163. Exist\u0103 o gam\u0103 larg\u0103 de expresii, variind de la &#8220;e\u015fti ca Iliescu&#8221; \u015fi &#8220;e\u015fti ca Ceau\u015fescu&#8221;, trec\u00e2nd prin &#8220;e\u015fti un comunist \u00eempu\u0163it&#8221; sau &#8220;ce m\u0103, vrei s\u0103 ajungem iar s\u0103 \u00eemp\u0103r\u0163im un corn?&#8221;, merg\u00e2nd p\u00e2n\u0103 la &#8220;E\u015fti un dictator \u00een miniatur\u0103!!!1&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A\u015fa c\u0103 propun s\u0103 denumim aceast\u0103 tendin\u0163\u0103 de comportament <a href=\"http:\/\/polimedia.us\/trilema\/2010\/usor-cu-banii-pe-scari\/#comment-12212\" target=\"_blank\">Kokofifi&#8217;s Law<\/a> (Legea lui Kokofifi), \u00een cinstea inventatoarei. \u015ei dac\u0103 mentalul colectiv tot nu reu\u015fe\u015fte s\u0103 scape de co\u015fmarul numit comunism, m\u0103car s\u0103-l trat\u0103m cu ironia cuvenit\u0103.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">EDIT Ianuarie 4:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Iat\u0103 \u015fi primul amendament, sau mai degrab\u0103 o reformulare a legii.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Indiferent de natura (subiectul) \u015fi mediul (online, offline) unei discu\u0163ii, pe m\u0103sur\u0103 ce aceasta se lunge\u015fte \u015fansele ca o <em>referin\u0163\u0103 non-ironic\u0103<\/em> la comunism\/Cea\u015fescu s\u0103 fie f\u0103cut\u0103 devin de 100%, iar \u015fansa ca \u00eentregul subiect s\u0103 se mute asupra lui Ceau\u015fescu sau comunismului tinde \u015fi ea spre 100%.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Aplicabilitatea acestei legi scade pe m\u0103sur\u0103 ce poporul rom\u00e2n \u00eenva\u0163\u0103 a se desp\u0103r\u0163i de trecut. \u00cen acest sens, exist\u0103 o invers-propor\u0163ionalitate \u00eentre modernitatea poporului rom\u00e2n \u015fi num\u0103rul de referin\u0163e la trecut.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Avantajul internetelor este c\u0103-s neterminate, infinite \u015fi bine\u00een\u0163eles gratuite. Dac\u0103 \u00een via\u0163a real\u0103 m\u0103 apuc s\u0103 vorbesc cu o persoan\u0103, discu\u0163ia fie merge \u00een consens \u015fi am\u00e2ndoi explor\u0103m pu\u0163in apoi fum\u0103m un joint; fie discu\u0163ia merge \u00een contradictoriu \u015fi petrecem un oarecare timp aduc\u00e2nd argumente pro \u015fi contra. La un moment dat obosim \u015fi fie &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-785","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-fara","7":"anons"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=785"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":788,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785\/revisions\/788"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/daimon.me\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}